data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1187/a118711af171172a412bd2af139189b376296d82" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/090cc/090ccfd417e9a62604d4bf13ae738721a32086a6" alt=""
Why? Did market research show that potential flock members dig the look? Is it mandated by an obscure Old Testament verse? Does it hide their pointed heads?
Are guys with thinning hair inferior? Is the Antichrist as bald as a Babylonian baby's butt?
Although I never miss a chance to take a shot at the fraudulent and potentially dangerous glut of preachers with political and financial agendas, this is a genuine query. Hair like that can't be considered flattering and the maintenance expense must be crushing. Why?
Simply making fun of big assed preacher hair is like shooting paralysed fish in a very small barrel. It's this easy.
No comments:
Post a Comment